District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1794

Boone v. Sinkler

Boone v. Sinkler
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided July 1, 1794 · Bay, Grimke, Waties
1 S.C.L. 369
Boone v. Sinkler

Opinion of the Court

The Court (present, the Chief Justice, and Grimke, Waties, and Bay, Judges)

were unanimous that the payment was good, and barred the recovery in this case. That this was a vested legacy, and not a marriage portion. That being a vested right, she had a power to receive it any time after she came of age ; though she could not compel the executor to pay it, if he did not think proper so to do. That it might be compared to receiving money on a bond, before it was due ; in which case, although the party could not demand or compel payment, }'et if the obligee chose to receive, and the obligor to pay, it was good, and should be binding on both parties.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.