Durfee v. Harper
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting a preliminary injunction. It grows out of the decision in the cases just heretofore decided by this Court, wherein F. M. Durfee was plaintiff, and Joseph H. Harper, assignee, and others, were defendants, and wherein the Thompson Investment Company was plaintiff and F. M. Durfee defendant [ante page 854, 56 Pac. 582). After the Court had found in those actions that the Thompson Investment Company was entitled to have the stock transferred to it upon the books of the Sunrise Mining & Milling Company, it was ordered that F. M. Durfee, as president of the Sunrise Company, execute a certificate for the 265,400f shares. Upon notice of appeal by thb plaintiff in those suits, the certificate referred to was ordered deposited with the Clerk of the District Court. Thereafter, about January 14, 1899, the plaintiff herein brought this action to restrain the Thompson Investment Company from voting the. said stock at the annual meeting of the Sunrise Company, to be held on January 20, 1899. In his
We think the District Court committed no error in granting plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction. The judgment appealed from in the actipns referred to in the foregoing statement directed the execution of a certificate for 265,400|-shares of the stock of the Sunrise Mining Company to the Thompson Investment Company. Section 1728 of the Code of Civil Procedure was thereafter complied with by Durfee’s depositing an executed certificate of shares with the clerk, with whom the judgment was entered, to abide the judgment of this Court. The appeal was perfected as provided by the Code. Thereupon all further proceedings in the District Court upon the judgment appealed from, and'upon the matters embraced therein, were stayed. The principal matter embraced in the judgment was the ownership of the stock represented by the certificate in the clerk’s hands. The object of the law in requiring an executed certificate to be deposited with that official was to preserve the rights of parties until it might be
The order appealed from is affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
A firmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.