Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /District of Columbia /Cases /District of Columbia Court of Appeals /

1914

100 District of Columbia Court of Appeals opinions from 1914.

  • Winter v. Hazen-Latimer Co. 42 App. D.C. 469, (D.C. 1914)
  • National Union v. Sawyer 42 App. D.C. 475, (D.C. 1914)
  • Mason v. Clapham 42 App. D.C. 481, (D.C. 1914)
  • Kingan & Co. v. Beall 42 App. D.C. 487, (D.C. 1914)
  • Golden & Co. v. Loving 42 App. D.C. 489, (D.C. 1914)
  • Pearce v. Capital Traction Co. 42 App. D.C. 493, (D.C. 1914)
  • Sims v. Roy 42 App. D.C. 496, (D.C. 1914)
  • United States Trust Co. v. Blundon 42 App. D.C. 500, (D.C. 1914)
  • United States ex rel. Lincoln Highway Ass'n v. Ewing 42 App. D.C. 508, (D.C. 1914)
  • Fletcher v. United States 42 App. D.C. 511, (D.C. 1914)
  • United States ex rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission 42 App. D.C. 514, (D.C. 1914)
  • Lyon v. Bursey 42 App. D.C. 519, (D.C. 1914)
  • Simmons v. Sullivan 42 App. D.C. 523, (D.C. 1914)
  • Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. Himelright 42 App. D.C. 532, (D.C. 1914)
  • Muhlfeld v. O'Connor 42 App. D.C. 546, (D.C. 1914)
  • Astrom v. Weimer 42 App. D.C. 550, (D.C. 1914)
  • Wilson v. Ellis 42 App. D.C. 552, (D.C. 1914)
  • Wilson v. Ellis 42 App. D.C. 555, (D.C. 1914)
  • Given v. New York Athletic Club 42 App. D.C. 558, (D.C. 1914)
  • Malz v. Fox 42 App. D.C. 560, (D.C. 1914)
  • Turner v. Ellinger 42 App. D.C. 562, (D.C. 1914)
  • Gammeter v. Thropp 42 App. D.C. 564, (D.C. 1914)
  • B. Fischer & Co. v. Knickerbocker Mills Co. 42 App. D.C. 570, (D.C. 1914)
  • Bender v. Engel 42 App. D.C. 574, (D.C. 1914)
  • Prall v. Stafford 42 App. D.C. 383, (D.C. 1914)
  • Ledrick v. United States 42 App. D.C. 384, (D.C. 1914)
  • Groo v. Norman & Robinson 42 App. D.C. 387, (D.C. 1914)
  • Ruppert v. McArdle 42 App. D.C. 392, (D.C. 1914)
  • Wheeler v. Palmer 42 App. D.C. 395, (D.C. 1914)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Dant 42 App. D.C. 398, (D.C. 1914)
  • Wilson v. Newburgh 42 App. D.C. 407, (D.C. 1914)
  • Chew v. District of Columbia 42 App. D.C. 410, (D.C. 1914)
  • Billings v. United States 42 App. D.C. 413, (D.C. 1914)
  • United States ex rel. Newman v. City & Suburban Railway 42 App. D.C. 417, (D.C. 1914)
  • Carmody v. Patchell 42 App. D.C. 426, (D.C. 1914)
  • Paylor v. United States 42 App. D.C. 428, (D.C. 1914)
  • Sullivan v. Tobin 42 App. D.C. 430, (D.C. 1914)
  • Keroes v. Coleman 42 App. D.C. 436, (D.C. 1914)
  • Burke v. District of Columbia 42 App. D.C. 438, (D.C. 1914)
  • Clark v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. 42 App. D.C. 444, (D.C. 1914)
  • Morse v. Brainerd 42 App. D.C. 448, (D.C. 1914)
  • American Security & Trust Co. v. Thompson 42 App. D.C. 382, (D.C. 1914)
  • Groo v. Whitney 42 App. D.C. 381, (D.C. 1914)
  • Equitable Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. McMillan 42 App. D.C. 374, (D.C. 1914)
  • Masters v. United States 42 App. D.C. 350, (D.C. 1914)
  • Kalbfus v. Siddons 42 App. D.C. 310, (D.C. 1914)
  • Ewing v. Standard Oil Co. 42 App. D.C. 321, (D.C. 1914)
  • Luchs v. Christman 42 App. D.C. 326, (D.C. 1914)
  • Addison v. Blair 42 App. D.C. 331, (D.C. 1914)
  • Re Hogan 42 App. D.C. 337, (D.C. 1914)
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑