District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1933

Credit Alliance Corp. v. Dellenoci

Credit Alliance Corp. v. Dellenoci
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided July 1, 1933 · Proctor
1 D.C. 99

Credit Alliance Corp. v. Dellenoci

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PROCTOR, J.

On Motion for Receiver:

Although there is no appearance or opposition by or on the behalf of the sole defendant, the bill shows that others *100holding prior liens have an interest in the property, which of course makes the appointment of a receiver and sale of the property a matter of concern to them. They should be made parties. The bill fails to show any value to the property above such prior liens. For these reasons the motion for a receiver is denied, but without prejudice to renew the same if the bill is reformed to overcome the foregoing deficiencies.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.