Fox v. Ickes
Fox v. Ickes
2 D.C. 26
Fox v. Ickes
Opinion of the Court
It appears from the proposed amended bills that the orders made by the defendant are not authorized by Congress, and had they been so authorized, would have deprived the plaintiffs of vested rights. The suits are not brought against the United States but to set aside unauthorized acts of the defendant in cases in which he has no discretionary powers, and is acting arbitrarily.
The motions for .leave to file the amended bills will be granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.