District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1935

Herzog v. Kronman

Herzog v. Kronman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided July 1, 1935 · Proctor
2 D.C. 146

Herzog v. Kronman

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PROCTOR, J.

Plaintiff’s attorneys state that the suit is for slander of title. The, demurrer in effect admits there were certain false statements concerning the claim, but nothing stated has reference to the title of any property of the estate or of plaintiff. Nothing was stated which directly or by innuendo disparages title to such property. For these and other reasons appearing, the demurrer to the second amended declaration will be sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.