District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1957

Nolan v. Robinson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided April 30, 1957 · Hood, Quinn, Rover

131 A.2d 401; 1957 D.C. App. LEXIS 341 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jack Politz, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Paul J. Kasloff, "Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The sole question raised on this appeal is whether error was committed in denying a motion to reinstate appellant’s action, dismissed for failure to prosecute with diligence.

It would 'serve no purpose to recite in detail the events that occurred. We have examined the voluminous record and find no basis for holding that the trial court abused its discretion.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.