District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1959

East v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided May 1, 1959 · Hood, Quinn, Rover

150 A.2d 633; 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 253 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Glover v. England (D.C. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, as the result of his conviction of various moving traffic violations, accumu*634lated over twelve points” and after due administrative proceedings his operator’s permit was revoked.1

All of the questions raised by petitioner in his appeal have heretofore been decided by this court adversely to his contentions.2

Affirmed.

. See Part V, Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.

. See Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575; Tillman v. Director of Vehicles, etc., D.C.Mun.App., 144 A.2d 922; Daniels v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 143 A.2d 95; Ritch v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 124 A.2d 301; Lambert v. Board of Com’rs of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 926.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.