Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals April 14, 1960

Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co., 160 A.2d 99 (D.C. 1960)

1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190

Hood, Quinn, Rover

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the appellees following a trial finding by the court in their favor.

Appellants have failed to file either a statement of proceedings and evi*100dence or a transcript of the trial testimony [our Rule 21(f) ]. It was incumbent on them to furnish us with a sufficient record to enable us to pass on the error of law assigned; absent such a record we have no way of determining whether the court was correct or not. Consequently we have no discretion except to affirm.1

It is so ordered.

. Levene v. Oliver, D.C.Mun.App., 158 A.2d 324; Courembis v. Morfessis, D.C.Mun.App., 142 A.2d 517.

Reference

Full Case Name: Robert K. GRAY and Elton Hailey, ellants v. J. LEO KOLB COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, and Joan E. Meyers
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published