District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1960

Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided April 14, 1960 · Hood, Quinn, Rover

160 A.2d 99; 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Douglas v. United States (D.C. 1964)
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company v. Jackson (D.C. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the appellees following a trial finding by the court in their favor.

Appellants have failed to file either a statement of proceedings and evi*100dence or a transcript of the trial testimony [our Rule 21(f) ]. It was incumbent on them to furnish us with a sufficient record to enable us to pass on the error of law assigned; absent such a record we have no way of determining whether the court was correct or not. Consequently we have no discretion except to affirm.1

It is so ordered.

. Levene v. Oliver, D.C.Mun.App., 158 A.2d 324; Courembis v. Morfessis, D.C.Mun.App., 142 A.2d 517.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.