District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1960

Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided April 14, 1960 · Hood, Quinn, Rover

160 A.2d 99; 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the appellees following a trial finding by the court in their favor.

Appellants have failed to file either a statement of proceedings and evi*100dence or a transcript of the trial testimony [our Rule 21(f) ]. It was incumbent on them to furnish us with a sufficient record to enable us to pass on the error of law assigned; absent such a record we have no way of determining whether the court was correct or not. Consequently we have no discretion except to affirm.1

It is so ordered.

. Levene v. Oliver, D.C.Mun.App., 158 A.2d 324; Courembis v. Morfessis, D.C.Mun.App., 142 A.2d 517.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.