Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1994

Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided September 28, 1994 · Farrell, Ferren, King, Schwelb, Steadman, Sullivan, Terry, Wagner
648 A.2d 674; 1994 D.C. App. LEXIS 176; 1994 WL 541127 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of respondent’s petition for rehearing en bane, petitioner’s opposition thereto, the motion of respondent for leave to file reply to opposition to petition, the lodged memorandum, and the petition of intervenor for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the motion of respondent for leave to file reply to opposition to petition is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged memorandum of respondent. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑