In re Parsons

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
In re Parsons, 678 A.2d 1022 (D.C. 1996)
1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 117; 1996 WL 329938
Farrell, King, Mack

In re Parsons

Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be publicly censured for commingling a client’s funds in violation of Disciplinary Rule 9-103(A), the letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Profession*1023al Responsibility, and it appearing that respondent elected not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(f)(1) of the Rules Governing the Bar, effective January 1, 1995, the recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility to impose discipline consisting of publicly censuring respondent is hereby adopted; it is, accordingly,

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, Charles C. Parsons, be and he hereby is, publicly censured.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Charles C. PARSONS, Esquire. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published