In re Frank
In re Frank
Opinion of the Court
In this original disciplinary proceeding, respondent Arthur J. Frank, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, is charged with failing to maintain adequate funds in his client trust accounts in violation of Rule 1.15(a) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months.
On April 2, 2004, Bar Counsel filed a specification of charges against respondent alleging that he had misappropriated a portion of settlement funds from a personal injury matter he had handled.
ORDERED that Arthur J. Frank be, and hereby is, suspended from the practice of law for six months. We direct respondent’s attention to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), and their effect on his eligibility for reinstatement. It is
So ordered.
. In violation of Rule 1.15 (a).
. See In re Edwards, 870 A.2d 90 (D.C. 2005); In re Davenport, 794 A.2d 602 (D.C. 2002).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re Arthur J. FRANK, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 419575)
- Status
- Published