District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009

In Re Stanley

In Re Stanley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided October 29, 2009 · Glickman, Thompson, Nebeker
982 A.2d 1146; 2009 WL 3460099 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Stanley

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of petitioner, Denise R. Stanley’s petition for reinstatement, this court’s opinion in In re Stanley, 769 A.2d 141 (D.C. 2001) indefinitely suspending petitioner from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, the Court of Appeals of Maryland’s order of reinstatement, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Denise R. Stanley, 385 Md. 319, 869 A.2d 750 (2005), and the statement of Bar Counsel concluding that petitioner is fit to resume the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and it further appearing that petitioner has filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that petitioner, Denise R. Stanley, be and hereby is reinstated to practice law in the District of Columbia. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that prior to practicing law in the District of Columbia, petitioner shall complete the mandatory course on the D.C. Rules on Professional Conduct and District of Columbia Practice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.