District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010

In re Christenson

In re Christenson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided June 3, 2010 · Nebeker, Terry, Thompson
996 A.2d 821; 2010 WL 2194444 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In re Christenson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the California Supreme Court disbarring *822respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Christenson, No. 08-N-13625 (Cal. Oct. 14, 2009) (en banc), this court’s March 30, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that G. Scott Christenson, Esquire, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C. 2006). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.