In re Christenson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
In re Christenson, 996 A.2d 821 (D.C. 2010)
2010 WL 2194444
Nebeker, Terry, Thompson

In re Christenson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the California Supreme Court disbarring *822respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Christenson, No. 08-N-13625 (Cal. Oct. 14, 2009) (en banc), this court’s March 30, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that G. Scott Christenson, Esquire, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C. 2006). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Reference

Full Case Name
In re G. Scott CHRISTENSON
Status
Published