District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011

In re Hildebrand

In re Hildebrand
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided December 8, 2011 · Glickman, King, Terry
32 A.3d 437; 2011 WL 6090092 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In re Hildebrand

Opinion of the Court

*438ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Virginia State Bar suspending respondent indefinitely from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court’s September 16, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline,

ORDERED that Kenneth E. Hildebrand, Esquire, is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C. 2006) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.