District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013

In re Lezell

In re Lezell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided April 25, 2013 · Beckwith, Blackburne, Reid, Rigsby
64 A.3d 882; 2013 WL 1760515 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In re Lezell

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the affidavit of Mark L. Lezell, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 25th day of April 2013

ORDERED that the said Mark L. Le-zell is hereby disbarred by consent, effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

*883The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.