ORDER

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Virginia for a period of three years, this court’s March 26, 2014, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show *1143 cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that William S. Bradbury is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of three years. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).