District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014

In re: Jin-Ho Cynn

In re: Jin-Ho Cynn
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided June 19, 2014 · Easterly, Nebeker, King
93 A.3d 245; 2014 WL 2807989 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In re: Jin-Ho Cynn

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Virginia for six months, this court’s April 14, 2014, order directing respondént to show cause why he should not be suspended for a period of six months as reciprocal discipline, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Jin-Ho Cynn is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.