In re Kenneth A. Martin

District of Columbia

Court of Appeals

No. 11-BG-775

IN RE KENNETH A. MARTIN,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 420600 BDN: 370-04 BEFORE: Fisher and Blackburne-Rigsby, Associate Judges and King, Senior Judge.

ORDER (Filed October 21, 2014)

On consideration of respondent’s consent motion for “Expedited Clarification of Reinstatement Conditions,” and whereas the opinion suspending respondent from the practice of law did not require “proof of rehabilitation” pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI § 16 (d), it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted. This court’s opinion, first issued on March 28, 2013 (reported at 67 A.3d 1032) and amended February 13, 2014 (amendment reported at 91 A.3d 564), which, in its very last sentence, conditioned reinstatement “upon compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI § 16 (d),” will be amended. Instead, the last sentence will condition reinstatement “upon compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI § 16 (c).”

PER CURIAM.

Copies to:

Daniel S. Schumack, Esquire

3900 Jermantown Road, Suite 300

Fairfax, VA 22030-4900 No. 11-BG-775

Eric L. Yaffe, Esquire

Chair, Board on Professional Responsibility

430 E Street, N.W., Suite 138

Washington, D.C. 20001

Wallace E. Shipp, Jr., Esquire

Bar Counsel, Office of Bar Counsel

515 5th Street, N.W., Suite 117

Washington, D.C. 20001