District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017

In re Sherlock v. Grigsby

In re Sherlock v. Grigsby
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided August 17, 2017 · Beckwith, McLeese, Farrell
167 A.3d 551; 2017 WL 3568392; 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 220 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In re Sherlock v. Grigsby

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent engaged in intentional misappropriation and recommends that the-respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has excepted to that conclusion and recommendation. We therefore accept the Board’s recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2).

Accordingly, it-is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V. Grigsby is' hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. For purposes of reinstatement, the period of disbarment will begin to run when Mr. Grigsby has filed an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.