District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020

In re Kim Y. Johnson-Ball

In re Kim Y. Johnson-Ball
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided January 30, 2020

In re Kim Y. Johnson-Ball

Opinion

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-BG-1050 IN RE KIM Y. JOHNSON-BALL A Member of the Bar of the 2019 DDN 245 District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 451982 BEFORE: Glickman and Fisher, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.

ORDER (FILED – January 30, 2020) On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this court’s November 21, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or her D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is ORDERED that Kim Y. Johnson-Ball is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.