District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020

In re Richard L. Morris

In re Richard L. Morris
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Decided July 30, 2020

In re Richard L. Morris

Opinion

District of Columbia Court of Appeals JUL 30 2020 No. 20-BS-352 IN RE RICHARD L. MORRIS Board Docket No. 20-PD-015 A Member of the Bar of the District DDN: 2019-D315 and 2020- of Columbia Court of Appeals D009

BEFORE: Beckwith and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.

ORDER On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 3(c)(1), to suspend respondent temporarily, and Disciplinary Counsel’s motion to file under seal, and it appearing respondent has not objected to the relief sought, it is ORDERED that Disciplinary Counsel’s motion to file under seal is granted.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Board’s petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, pending further order based on (i) Disciplinary Counsel’s notification to the court that respondent has responded to the Board orders, or (ii) the court’s determination that adequate responses have been filed by respondent. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the court and the Board shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

PER CURIAM No. 20-BS-352 Copies e-served to: Richard L. Morris James T. Phalen, Esquire Executive Attorney Board on Professional Responsibility Hamilton P. Fox, III, Esquire Disciplinary Counsel Office of Disciplinary Counsel Julia Porter, Esquire Deputy Disciplinary Counsel Office of Disciplinary Counsel

oio

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.