Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1818

Marshall v. Ball

Marshall v. Ball
Court of Chancery of Delaware · Decided August 26, 1818
2 Del. Cas. 455; 1818 Del. LEXIS 53

Counsel

McLane for complainants. Rogers for defendants. . . .

Marshall v. Ball

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The right of the party should be established at law, and the precise place ascertained, upon which a writ of injunction might be fixed, so as to protect the party from any wrong. This has not been done, and indeed there is no proof that any timber or stones have been taken from the condemned land, nor any threats or danger that such will be the case. The complainants had an opportunity to try their rights at law; they neglected to do so. The bill must be dismissed with costs to defendants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.