Grose v. McMullen
Grose v. McMullen
2 Del. Ch. 227
Opinion of the Court
considered that the bond, although not yet due, was assets for the payment of the testator’s debts; and that it was not exempted by the mere charge of the debts on real estate; that the will must show an intent, express or implied, to exonerate the personal estate, and that in this will, such intent is not sufficiently demonstrable. A decree was entered to marshal the assets, and ordering a sale of the Townsend bond for that purpose.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.