Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1931

Satterthwaite v. Eastern Bankers Corp.

Satterthwaite v. Eastern Bankers Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · Decided March 12, 1931
17 Del. Ch. 310; 154 A. 475; 1931 Del. Ch. LEXIS 51

Counsel

Charles C. Keedy, and William B. Kealy, of New York, for relator., Clarence A. Southerland, of the firm of Ward & Gray, for defendant.

Satterthwaite v. Eastern Bankers Corp.

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor

held that the claim for refund could not be expected to be pressed with confidence in its merits by the present officers and directors who, if the facts upon which the merits of the claim for refund rest are true, were guilty of so manipulating the corporation’s financial showing as to make a false appearance of profits out of which dividends were declared *312by them; that the defendant is entitled to have the merits of the claim for refund intelligently and sincerely urged before the commissioner to the end that resort to suit for collection of the overpaid taxes with its necessary expense and delay might possibly be avoided; and that it would not be reasonable to permit the fate of the claim for refund to be :left under the possibility of' a withdrawal by the officers and directors whose personal interests were in opposition to it. Accordingly an order appointing a receiver pendente lite was entered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.