United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2026

Vernon E. Cephas v. Robert May, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of...

Vernon E. Cephas v. Robert May, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of...
United States District Court for the District of Delaware · Decided January 5, 2026
Vernon E. Cephas v. Robert May, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of...

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VERNON E. CEPHAS, ) Petitioner, V. C.A. No. 23-491-CFC-LDH ROBERT MAY, Warden, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ) STATE OF DELAWARE, ) Respondents.

ORDER WHEREAS Petitioner has filed objections (D.I. 38) to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation issued on September 17, 2025 (D.I. 32); WHEREAS the Magistrate Judge recommended in the Report and Recommendation that the Court deny Petitioner’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by A Person in State Custody (D.I. 3); WHEREAS the Magistrate Judge had the authority to make her findings and recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); WHEREAS this Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations de novo, § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011); WHEREAS this Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s thoughtful analysis and conclusions and does not think she made any legal error; NOW THEREFORE, on this Fifth day of January in 2026, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (D.I. 38) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (D.I. 32) is ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff's Petition (D.I. 3) is DISMISSED and the relief requested therein is DENIED; and 4. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has failed to satisfy the standards set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

LF

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.