Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris
Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris
1 Del. 22
Opinion of the Court
—This evidence is not competent. You must first prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness if he be dead, or insane, or infamous. It is not sufficient to prove the handwriting of the obligor. This is permitted only where the witness does not recollect being present at the time, or did not attest the execution of the instrument.
The plff. was nonsuited.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.