Superior Court of Delaware, 1832

Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris

Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided July 5, 1832 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic> &#8212;
1 Del. 22

Counsel

Bates for plff. Huffington for deft.

Lambden's Ex'r v. Norris

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

—This evidence is not competent. You must first prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness if he be dead, or insane, or infamous. It is not sufficient to prove the handwriting of the obligor. This is permitted only where the witness does not recollect being present at the time, or did not attest the execution of the instrument.

The plff. was nonsuited.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.