Superior Court of Delaware, 1832

Sipple v. Scotten

Sipple v. Scotten
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided July 5, 1832
1 Del. 107

Counsel

Frame, for plff.

Sipple v. Scotten

Opinion of the Court

The court

said the sale must be set aside. The property was not levied on until the day of sale. The act of assembly (Dig. 240.^ provides that goods shall not be sold until thirty days after levy and. notice. In England seizure and possession is the only levy, but here the practice is not to take the goods into actual possession. Is not therefore an inventory and appraisement the substitute for the levy? It would seem reasonable. But the lease was not advertised. *108 Every article need not be specified in the notice of sale, but the most prominent and valuable should be. An unexpired term in a farm is of this description and ought to have been noticed. It sold in this case for $17, and is proved to have been worth $150.

.Frame, for plff.

Rule absolute,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.