Superior Court of Delaware, 1835

Beeson's Ex'r. v. Beeson's Adm'r

Beeson's Ex'r. v. Beeson's Adm'r
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided July 5, 1835
2 Del. 37

Counsel

Bayard, in support of the rule,, Hamilton contra,, Hamilton and Booth for plaintiff, J. A Bayard for defendant-.

Beeson's Ex'r. v. Beeson's Adm'r

Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

said, the case in Term Reports has been overrul *38 ed again and again. The undoubted principle of the common law is; that you cannot, go beyond the penalty, except a shilling by way of nominal damages; But our act of assembly is conclusive (Digest 78.) All the sections of this law proceed on the same principle, that judgment shall be for the penalty and Costs-.

Hamilton and Booth for plaintiff J. A Bayard for defendant-.

Buie absolute;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.