Superior Court of Delaware, 1838

Sipple v. Anderson

Sipple v. Anderson
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided July 5, 1838
2 Del. 346

Counsel

Robinson, for defendant,, Ridgely and BrincTcloe, for plaintiffs., Robinson, for defendant.

Sipple v. Anderson

Opinion of the Court

The Court

said, that it was not a legal ground of continuance. The party should have applied for the bill earlier.

Motion refused.

The parties then agreed to refer the cause, if the court would express an opinion as to the propriety of allowing interest on the account. The court said, it was usual to allow interest on a merchant’s account after six months. The best plan is to make rests in the ao count.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.