Superior Court of Delaware, 1852

Coxe's Adm'r. v. Devine

Coxe's Adm'r. v. Devine
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided July 5, 1852
5 Del. 375

Counsel

Mr. Bayard , Mr. Bayard , Bayard, for plaintiff., Rogers, for defendant.

Coxe's Adm'r. v. Devine

Opinion of the Court

The Court

ruled them out for this purpose, saying they were admissible only to charge the party to the suit, and not to show accounts between other persons.

The Chief Justice

charged:—1. If knowing the principal, a sale be made to an agent, and credit be given to the agent, the seller cannot turn round and sue the principal.

*376 Bayard, for plaintiff. Rogers, for defendant.

2. If a sale be made to an agent, without knowledge of the principal, and the principal be afterwards discovered, the seller may sue the principal, though he charge the goods to the agent; provided he do so at such time as will not disturb any settlement as between principal and agent. [Roscoe Ev., 216,, Bate vs. Burr; 4 Harr. Rep., 130; 1 Camp. Rep., 867.)

Verdict for plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.