McDowell v. Simpson
Opinion of the Court
This is not a plea in abatement either in form or substance, nor is the, variance relied on properly the subject-matter of a plea in abatement; nor can it be properly pleaded in bar of the action. It is not a plea of the former description-, because it neither commences nor ¡concludes as a plea in abatement, but as a plea in bar, nor does it pretend to furnish the plaintiff below with a better writ or process for the institution of his suit in this Court, as every plea in abatement of the writ must do, and which in no case originating here by appeal, of course, could be done. Neither can it be treated as a plea in bar, although the matter relied on, that is to say, the inability of a husband to sue by his wife,-would constitute a complete defence to the suit as instituted below, because a plea in bar is always addressed to the declaration, and the declaration here is all right and in proper form:
We consider, however, the variance in this case between the transcript of the suit below and the pronarr filed in this Court, though not a proper ground for either a plea.in abatement or a plea in bar, for the reasons stated, a fatal objection to the prosecution of the appeal; for had the declaration conformed to the transcript, it would have been defective on general demurrer, and could not have been sustained.
Instead therefore of seeking to take advantage of this objection by a plea in abatement, or in bar, the proper course in-our opinion for the appellant to pursue would be, to move to set aside the declaration for irregularity; be
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.