Superior Court of Delaware, 1869

Newport National Bank v. Tweed

Newport National Bank v. Tweed
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided July 5, 1869
9 Del. 97

Counsel

Harrington , for the plaintiff. Whitely , for the defendant.

Newport National Bank v. Tweed

Opinion of the Court

The cashier of the Bank testified to the making and indorsement of the note and the discounting of it by the Bank, also to the nonpayment of it by the maker at maturity, and that it was duly protested for non payment, and that he gave the Notary Public directions to issue the notices of the protest and to address one of them by mail that day to the defendant at his residence in Newark, and saw the notices duly prepared by him, but not that he saw them inclosed, addressed, or deposited, in the post office at Newport.

On motion of the counsel for the defendant the plaintiff was nonsuited.

Harrington, for the plaintiff.

Whitely, for the defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.