Superior Court of Delaware, 1898

Miller v. Hickman

Miller v. Hickman
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided April 12, 1898 · Eorb
17 Del. 263; 1 Penne. 263; 40 A. 192; 1898 Del. LEXIS 16

Counsel

John M. Richardson, Chas. F. Richards and R. C. White for plaintiff., Chas. M. Cullen and Chas. W. Cullen for defendant.

Miller v. Hickman

Opinion of the Court

EorB, C. J:—

The rule is that as soon as the calendar is published and announced by the ' Court, subpoenas should be issued for the witnesses, and unless this is done, the party takes the risk of being guilty of laches.

The calendar was made out in this case on Tuesday afternoon April 5th, yet the announcement was not made until Wednesday morning April 6th, after court convened. It is agreed here that this witness went to Philadelphia at eight o’clock a. m. April 6th, and therefore he could not have been served after the calendar was announced.

Under the circumstances, the plaintiff has brought himself within the rule. We. therefore order the case continued to the October term under a peremptory rule.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.