Superior Court of Delaware, 1905

Hazel v. Cacy

Superior Court of Delaware · Decided May 10, 1905 · Lore

21 Del. 360; 5 Penne. 360; 63 A. 196; 1905 Del. LEXIS 24

Counsel

W. H. Cooper, Jr., for plaintiff in error., James L. Wolcott for defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

Lore, C. J.:

—We overrule that exception.

Mr. Cooper: My second exception is,—

That the record does not set forth what the notices contained or stated.

Revised Code 759, Sec. 33.

Mr. Wolcott: The question raised by the second exception has been passed upon by this Court in the case of Jump vs. Jones, 3 Pennewill, 163 (164).

Lore, C. J.:

The case of Jump vs. Jones seems to be conclusive upon the last exception. Let the judgment below be affirmed, on the ground of stare decisis.

Judgment below affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.