Superior Court of Delaware, 1907

Doe v. Roe

Doe v. Roe
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided April 17, 1907
25 Del. 414; 2 Boyce 414; 86 A. 517; 1907 Del. LEXIS 59

Counsel

George N. Davis for plaintiff., Charles W. Cullen and Henry Ridgely for defendant.

Doe v. Roe

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

The concluding paragraph of the case stated is: — “If the Court shall be of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the premises in question, mentioned in the demise laid in her declaration, then judgment shall be entered for her, but if not, judgment shall be entered for the defendant.”

The court is clearly of the opinion that, under the facts and questions of law presented, judgment should be entered for the defendant, which is accordingly done.

And now, to wit, this seventeenth day of April, A. D. 1907, this cause having been heard, and the court being of the opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover the premises in question, mentioned in the demise laid in her declaration, judgment is hereby entered for the defendant.

(Signed by the court.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.