Superior Court of Delaware, 1913

Carey v. Carey

Carey v. Carey
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided October 20, 1913 · Pennewill
28 Del. 53; 5 Boyce 53; 90 A. 405; 1913 Del. LEXIS 4

Counsel

Richard R. Kenney for plaintiff., The defendant was unrepresented by counsel.

Carey v. Carey

Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.:

In an action for divorce, where the ground relied upon is adultery or bigamy, and the defendant cannot be served personally, in order that the court may have jurisdiction, there must have been publication as provided by the act, and the plaintiff must either have been a bona fide resident of the state at the time the cause of action arose, and continued so to be down to the time of the commencement of the action, or must, since the cause *56of action arose, have become, and for at least two years next preceding the commencement of the action continued to be, a bona fide resident of the state.

The petition is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.