Jefferson v. Padley
Jefferson v. Padley
29 Del. 553; 6 Boyce 553; 100 A. 600; 1917 Del. LEXIS 25
Opinion of the Court
At one time in this state, under such circumstances, it was necessary to issue the alias or pluries fi. fa. in the form of a fi. fa. for the residue. Fiddleman v. Biddle, 1 Harr. 500. However, this practice has been changed for many years and it is now sufficient if the alias or pluries writ issues in the general form of an alias or pluries fi. fa. Woolley on Del. Practice, § 1002.
As the form of the writ issued in this case follows the established practice, we are of the opinion that it should not be quashed. The court therefore refuse the motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.