Superior Court of Delaware, 1919

McCall v. Stern

McCall v. Stern
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided February 12, 1919
30 Del. 233; 7 Boyce 233; 105 A. 666; 1919 Del. LEXIS 17

Counsel

Wilbur L. Adams for plaintiff., Edmund S. Hellings for defendants.

McCall v. Stern

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Where it appears that the officer in charge of the execution of the writ of replevin refused to give reasonable time to the defendant in the writ to give property bond and retain possession of the goods pending the action of replevin, the court -will direct to be issued a unit of de retorno habendo pendente lite, upon the entering of proper and sufficient security by the defendant in the writ of replevin.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.