Superior Court of Delaware, 1919

Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided March 28, 1919 · Boyce
30 Del. 283; 7 Boyce 283; 105 A. 833; 1919 Del. LEXIS 23

Counsel

James Saulsbury for plaintiff., J. Frank Ball for defendant.

Smith v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Boyce, J:

The evidence now before the court, and that which the plaintiff proposes to offer, fails to show that the defendant is guilty of the excessive use of intoxicating liquors.

“Habitual drunkenness” in the statute must be understood in its ordinary and popular meaning, that is, the condition of one given over to the use of alcoholic liquors. The habitual use of an drugs, though it may cause a condition similar to that produced nactio by the excessive use of intoxicating liquors, will not sustain for divorce, the cause being based upon “habitual drunkenness.”

The petition will be dismissed without prejudice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.