Superior Court of Delaware, 1920

Cross v. Payne

Cross v. Payne
Superior Court of Delaware · Decided December 10, 1920
31 Del. 132; 1 W.W. Harr. 132; 111 A. 741; 1920 Del. LEXIS 18

Counsel

Charles C. Keedy for plaintiff., H. H. Ward, Jr., (of Ward, Gray and Neary) for defendant.

Cross v. Payne

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant has filed a general demurrer to the one count contained in plaintiff’s declaration, and the objection urged is that the count is too general. A general demurrer goes to the sufficiency of the opposing pleading without disclosing the nature of the objection, and is sufficient when the objection is to matter of substance in the pleading. The objection by the defendant urged is not based upon want of sufficiency in substance, but upon a lack or want of sufficient particularity in the count. Where the sufficiency of particularity of a count in a declaration is questioned, a special demurrer should be employed showing specifically the particular grounds relied on.

The demurrer is overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.