Laurel Produce Growers Ass'n v. Gordy

We think that the book in question has been sufficiently identified as being the account book of the defendant in its transactions with the plaintiff. We, therefore, think that it is admissible against the defendant on the ground that it is an admission against interest. 2 Ency. of Ev., pp. 664, 666; Currier v. Boston & M. R. Co., 31 N. H. 209; Allen v. Coitt, 6 Hill. (N. Y.) 318.