Wilson v. Kollock
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RANDA VVILSON, Plaintiff, C. A. No. Nl6C-10-224 FWW V. MIRANDA L. KOLLOCK, VV\./v`/\/V\./V Defendant.
Submitted: November 17, 2017 Decided: December 20, 2017 On Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment GRANTED M 'l`his 20th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion Summary Judgment and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that: (l) On October 27, 2016 Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action as a result on a motor vehicle accident. (2) On January 4, 2017, Defendant answered the Complaint. (3) On October 23, 2017 Defendant moved for an enlargement of time to flle a motion for summary judgment. (4) On November 6, 207 the Motion for an Enlargement of Time to File a Motion for Summary Judgment Was granted and a Motion for Summary Judgment Was filed the same day. The Motion for Summary Judgment asserts that Defendant is entitled to summary judgment because Plaintiff is unable, as a matter of laW, to meet her burden of proof that Defendant breached a duty of care and that the breach of that duty Was the proximate cause of the accident that caused Plaintiff’ s injuries. (5) At argument on the Motion for an Enlargement Time to File a Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a response by November 17, 2017. (6) Plaintiff failed to file a response to the Motion for Summary Judgment by November 17, 2017, and as of the date of this Order has not filed a response.
NOW, THEREFORE, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of an Answer is GRANTED as unopposed.
SO ORDERED. '1/) Fe?\is W. Whartd'n, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.