Pickett v. Collier
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHAWN PICKETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N24C-09-263 CLS RANDY COLLIER, SIMPLY GREEN, ) ) Defendants. )
Submitted: February 19, 2025 Decided: March 26, 2025 ORDER This 25th day of March 2025, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (“the Motion”);1 Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Motion is DENIED for the following reasons: The Motion is denied as untimely. The Motion was filed more than five (5) days after the filing of the Court’s decision.2
D.I. 18.
“A motion for reargument shall be served and filed within 5 days after the filing of the Court's opinion or decision.” Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e).
Further, Plaintiff does not identify any controlling precedent or legal principle that this Court overlooked, nor does he demonstrate the Court misapprehended the law or facts in a way that would affect the outcome of its decision.3 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Calvin Scott Calvin L. Scott, Jr. Judge
Cummings v. Jimmy’s Grille, Inc., 2000 WL 1211167, at *2 (Del. Super. Aug. 9, 2000).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.