Chase v. Bell Funeral Home
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DARLA CHASE, Individually and as ) Administrator of THE ESTATE OF ) ROLAND T. JOHNSON, SR., and ) LAVERNE WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N24C-05-216 CLS ) v. ) ) BELL FUNERAL HOME, L.L.C., ) COLEMAN’S FUNERAL SERVICES, ) HAVEN MEMORIAL PARK ) CEMETERY AND CREMATORY, ) INC., AND KIA CAREY, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reargument (“the Motion”) and the responses hereto,1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Plaintiffs do not identify any controlling precedent or legal principle that this Court overlooked, nor do they demonstrate the Court misapprehended the law or facts in a way that would affect the outcome of its decision.2
See D.I. 49, 50, 51, 52.
Cummings v. Jimmy’s Grille, Inc., 2000 WL 1211167, at *2 (Del. Super. Aug. 9, 2000).
Kia Carey in her personal capacity remains dismissed in this action. If circumstances arise that justify returning her as a defendant, the Court is receptive to that motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Calvin Scott Judge Calvin L. Scott, Jr.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.