Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.

This 26th day of November 2008, it appears to the Court that: (1) On September 11, 2008, the defendant-below/appellant filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court arbitrator's order dated August 12, 2008.^[1] On September 12, 2008, the Clerk issued a notice directing that the appellant show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for this Court's lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an arbitrator's order.^[2] The appellant's response to the notice to show cause does not address the Court's lack of jurisdiction to consider his appeal.

(2) An arbitrator's order is not a final judgment for purposes of appeal to this Court.^[3] The sole remedy for any party in an action subject to arbitration is a demand for a trial de novo.^[4]

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

NOTES

[1] It appears from the Superior Court docket that the arbitrator's order concerned plaintiff-below/appellee's complaint filed on February 7, 2008.

[2] See Del. Const. art. IV, § 11 (2007) (providing for jurisdiction of Supreme Court); Super. Ct. Civ. R. 16.1(k)(11)(C) (2007) (providing that an arbitration order shall not be subject to appeal) (repealed on Feb. 5, 2008, effective in civil actions filed after Mar. 1, 2008).

[3] Redden v. McGill, 549 A.2d 695, 697-98 (Del. 1988).

[4] Del. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 16.1(k)(11)(D); Williams v. Leager, 2003 WL 1857527 (Del. Supr.) (citing Redden v. McGill, 549 A.2d 695, 697-98 (Del. 1988)).