Supreme Court of Delaware, 2010

In the Matter of Petition of Woods.

In the Matter of Petition of Woods.
Supreme Court of Delaware · Decided May 28, 2010 · Steele, Chief Justice, Holland and Ridgely, Justices
996 A.2d 795; 2010 Del. LEXIS 246; 2010 WL 2164529 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
In the Matter of Petition of Woods.

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF BERNARD WOODS FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

No. 273, 2010.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: May 17, 2010.
Decided: May 28, 2010.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.

This 28th day of May 2010, the Court has considered the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the petitioner, Bernard Woods, and the answer and motion to dismiss filed by the State of Delaware. The petition for a writ of certiorari is lacking in any averments to invoke the original jurisdiction of this Court.[1] The petition appears to reargue this Court's Order of April 26, 2010 that affirmed the Superior Court's denial of the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief.[2] A petitioner who has an adequate remedy in the appellate process[3] may not use an extraordinary writ as a substitute for appellate review.[4]

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of certiorari is DISMISSED.

NOTES

[1] Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(5); Del. Supr. Ct. R. 43.

[2] See Woods v. State, 2010 WL 1664008 (Del. Supr.) (affirming Superior Court's judgment).

[3] See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 18 (providing for reargument of Court's order on timely-filed and otherwise conforming motion for reargument).

[4] Matushefske v. Herlihy, 214 A.2d 883, 885 (Del. 1965).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.