Simmons v. Pruitt
Simmons v. Pruitt
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ARCHIE SIMMONS, JR., § § No. 701, 2014 Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware, § in and for New Castle County CYNTHIA H. PRUITT, ESQUIRE, § and DOROSHOW, PASQUALE, § KRAWITZ & BHAYA, § C.A. No. N13C-07-076 (EMD) § Defendants-Below, Appellees. §
Submitted: June 24, 2015 Decided: June 24, 2015
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
This 24th day of June 2015, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the
record below, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant in this case concedes that the resolution of his appeal depends
on this Court’s decision in another case pressed by the appellant’s counsel, Blue
Hen v. Little Sisters of the Poor.1 The appellant here suffered a dismissal of his
claim for malicious prosecution when the Superior Court, as in Blue Hen, refused
to extend the tort of malicious prosecution to cover a situation when the plaintiff
had probable cause to pursue litigation in good faith in the first instance but at
1 Blue Hen Mech., Inc. v. Christian Bros. Risk Pooling Trust, 2015 WL 3745640 (Del. June 15, 2015). 1 some point later in the litigation allegedly came to lack a good faith basis to persist
in pressing his claims.
(2) Because we affirmed the Superior Court’s decision in Blue Hen, the
appellant has conceded that his present appeal must be rejected and the stipulation
for summary judgment and accompanying order of the Superior Court must be
affirmed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the
Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
2
Reference
- Status
- Published