Zucker v. Hassell
Zucker v. Hassell
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MURRAY ZUCKER, § § No. 606, 2016 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below: v. § § Court of Chancery GERALD L. HASSELL, ROBERT P. § of the State of Delaware KELLY, RUTH E. BRUCH, § NICHOLAS M. DONOFRIO, § C.A. No. 11625 EDMUND F. KELLY, RICHARD J. § KOGAN, MICHAEL J. KOWALSKI, § JOHN A. LUKE, JR., MARK A. § NORDENBERG, CATHERINE A. § REIN, WILLIAM C. RICHARDSON, § SAMUEL C. SCOTT III, JOHN P. § SURMA, STEVEN G. ELLIOTT, § ROBERT MEHRABIAN, WESLEY § W. VON SCHACK, RICHARD § MAHONEY, JORGE RODRIGUEZ § and DAVID NICHOLS, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees, § § And § § THE BANK OF NEW YORK § MELLON CORPORATION, § § Nominal Defendant Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 14, 2017 Decided: June 19, 2017
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices. ORDER
This 19th day of June 2017, the Court, having considered this matter on the oral
arguments and briefs of the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the
basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion
of November 30, 2016.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court
of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
2
Reference
- Status
- Published